Latest Headlines
- The 'Real' Rabbi Broyde Scandal
- SEX. And the Beacon. Where'd it Go?
- How YU Left Me Estranged From Exercise
- Polishing the Jewel That is “The YU Commentator” Before it is Too Late
- YCDS’ 12 Angry Men Inspired by Syms Students Forced to Take English Lit Class
- United Nations Out of Ideas On What To Condemn Israel About
Popular YU Articles
| Observer Publishes Edgy Article About Girl Who Davens Maariv |
|
|
| YU |
| Written by Eli Lebowicz |
| Sunday, 11 December 2011 |
|
Nowhere But Here.
Last week, The Observer,
Stern College’s non-satirical news source, published an article that did more
than just raise a few waxed eyebrows across the YU community. The article entitled “Overzealous Girl Davens Maariv” sparked
tremendous controversy across the Jewish world, leading many to debate whether
or not it was appropriate for a YU newspaper to discuss the topic of Maariv so publicly. One side adamantly
voiced the opinion that, although one Stern girl may decide to daven Maariv, she by no means represents the norm of the student body. The
other side affirmed that women davening Maariv
is not that big of a deal, and although the piece in question was weird and
bizarre, it wasn’t really offensive. Then there was a group of people in the middle who weren’t
really sure what the hell was going on, most just wondering why the writer had
called her cousin afterwards. One student stumbled upon the article by
accident. He said, “I was just trying to find the website that tells you about
free food.” The Observer has
never cowered from toeing the lines of controversy. Some previous pieces that
were met with outrage include: “Segula
of Eating Shwarma to Find Bashert
Doesn’t Seem to Be Working,” “Brookdale Lounge Bathroom Voted Most Convenient
in the City,” and “Stern Girl Unsure how to Spend Summer: Taking LSAT or Getting
Engaged.” Despite the uproar their articles created, The Observer defended its
writers and their right to write about whatever topics they choose, no matter
how arbitrary they may be. The Observer isn’t
the only YU publication that has recently defended its edgy material. Just a
few weeks ago, The Associate—previously
demoted from The Executive and slated
for demotion yet again to The Intern—published
an angry, but still inadvertently humorous piece bashing The Quipster, the fortieth YU newspaper. The over-the-top rant, which set a record for most times a thesaurus
had been consulted in one article, was filled with ridiculous claims, like
fascist dictator Adolf Hitler loving Mountain Dew, and the registrar at YU
being awesome. It was written in response to a Quipster article discussing how Syms School of Business (SSB) would
be renamed Business School, or BS for short. The Associate article was outraged that this clever article recounted
every BS aspect of YU except the BS newspaper itself. The Quipster apologized for the oversight, but made a case that
they simply forgot the paper existed. The Editor-in-Chief of The Associate then released a
university-wide email swelling with pride at her obsoleteness, stating that the
paper’s articles will remain unedited and authentic, no matter how many
spelling errors or Nazi references are in them. This whole journalistic tumult has put YU in a position as
awkward as a horrible shidduch date.
The university maintains that it wants its students to be able to voice their
opinions, but, as one official put it, “Maariv
can’t just be discussed so explicitly and provocatively. We tried, through
different PR means, to distract people from the controversy. Why do you think
we released the Maccabeats from the dungeon in Muss hall where we usually keep them?” This has been a hectic week around Yeshiva University. One
administrator said, “YU is a model of Modern Orthodoxy. It serves as a beacon
of hope… oh crap.” |



